Saturday, November 13, 2010

The Mid-Term Effect on R&D Funding

Now what for science and technology funding?

The situation was already rather mixed.  Democrats failed to make a case for a major innovation boom based on a serious increase in public funding.  They left public spending in the twilight zone of the last-resort safety net, and now a repositioning will come too late. The Financial Times reported that the Republican victory killed flagship elements of Obama’s innovation policy for at least for the next two years. In “Corporate America welcomes power shift" (print title), the FT observes that cap-and-trade and net neutrality are gone, to be replaced by coal-and-oil and the cable cartels.  The same goes for defense conversion, which would have helped research-and-development funding of the kind conducted at universities. The New York Times' Frank Rich has pointed out that neither party offered a coherent storyline in which clear solutions follow well-described problems. In spite of its favorable stance towards science, the Obama Administration does not have a serious innovation policy that aims at supporting the creation of both knowledge and middle-class jobs. And neither party has a plan for supporting and expanding public universities.

Is this what people voted for? There is no popular support for the abandonment of renewable energy, or for the economic inefficiencies of the inequality boom, or for a recovery limited to the top end of the financial industry, or for a recovery based on the Fed reinflating asset bubbles, or for tuition increases at double to quadruple the consumer price index.  But the funding news is not good. The AAAS has a useful comment (scroll down to "Post-Election Outlook on Federal R&D Funding"). This table shows that energy research at the DOE would take a particular hit if the Republicans make good on their pledge.

Our ASU and CSPO colleague Dan Sarewitz has a good comment on the general issue, which is that funding levels get too much attention and social purposes not enough.
Boosting funds for basic research is also safer politics than actually tackling a national problem. . . . Doubling the NSF budget makes good politics. But what about good policy? Although few would question the value of a robust basic-science enterprise, we just don't know how marginal increases in basic-research funding affect a nation's capacity to solve social and economic problems. On the other hand, decades of research on the links between science and innovation in areas ranging from jet engines to medicines show that basic research best contributes to economic and social goals when targeted at areas that can directly benefit from additional fundamental knowledge.

If Congress wanted to allocate scarce new R&D resources wisely during a protracted period of budgetary austerity, it wouldn't adopt a doubling strategy, but would instead take a more surgical approach to set priorities. It would focus investments where links between science and application are well established, to deliver short- to medium-term benefits. Alternative energy, for example, offers many technological options where basic research can improve performance.
Sarewitz is here pitching "Pasteur's Quadrant" in vital areas rather than basic research. I think he hammers basic research mistakenly at the end ("I know that such an approach would be fiercely opposed by the leading voices of the scientific community, who will never abandon the long-falsified belief that basic research is most valuable to society as a bottom-up enterprise driven only by inherent scientific interest.")  But I share his distress at the refusal of politicians -- and science policy leaders -- to articulate social goals and then fund R&D that addresses them.

The U.S. is the only major power where socially-beneficial tech development is hamstrung by a deep political phobia about industrial policy.  Our lunch is being eaten in solar energy and other domains by the country with the most systematic industrial policy in the world - China.  This is a bad time to push for science policy rooted in social development -- something only public agencies can do.  But it is also even more urgent now than it was when Obama was elected two years ago.

22 comments:

  1. Thanks for this post. I have myself been thinking about posting on the topic of mechanisms to achieve the "social benefit" aims stated in the NNI (and underlying much of rhetoric supporting the nano industry). Here are some preliminary thoughts I have in response to this post. I like the cited author's suggestion to focus the nano industry on areas like energy efficiency where nano R&D can actually have an impact in the short- and medium-term. The alternative--to focus on "long-term" social benefit impacts of nano R&D--would seem mainly to be a proxy for allowing the practice of unfettered scientific research that the author points to as the U.S.' nationalistic leanings towards "scientific interest". I would like to see the U.S. government redirect more policy to practical mechanisms to achieve social benefits. What are the mechanisms by which nano R&D--and especially social science data about nano R&D--can be used to achieve social benefits? Have their been any processes put in place to, for example, incorporate public input into actual decision-making structures affecting nano R&D directions--who has control over these processes and ensures their implementation in a democratic or just manner?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for such informative blog about The Mid-Term Effect on R&D Funding.it really prove worthwhile in my Midwife Nurse Practitioner Salary business.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is a very important information about Science and technology. I would really like it and i hope this blog is helpful for my Air Conditioning Service West Palm Beach, FL business. It provide best AC services.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The mid-term effect on R & D funding is really useful in our technology and it is a renewable energy, or for the economic inefficiencies of the financial industry. This info is really helpful for my air duct cleaning pompano beach coupon business.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It is a valuable info about the science and technology and i hope this blog is really useful for my air cleaner business. It provide good Air Cleaner equipments make Air Purify.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Our Employee Scheduling Software business,it is a ShiftPlanning allows you to schedule smarter by letting you work with the most current and accurate data. Know who is available, who is on overtime, who are your top employees, who is on vacation and more.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It is a better way to keep up with your favorite teams than by watching them play LIVE ON YOUR COMPUTER! Simply sign up today and start watching all your favorite teams in just minutes, Watch College Basketball Online games from anywhere in the world quickly and easily.

    ReplyDelete
  8. we work harder to provide you with the best Watch Hockey Online games for each match that is played in the NHL. Whatever your favorite team is you can watch live NHL through the exhibition phase of the season.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Locksmith CT business, it provide complete locksmith services to Connecticut for commercial, residential, automotive and emergency purposes.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Our one of my air conditioning Manassas, VA business, we are able to find and fix problems the first time and ensure that our new systems are properly sized to provide maximum comfort for your family.

    ReplyDelete
  11. When the air conditioner is properly matched with a furnace or air handler, you get maximum efficiency and longer system life. Air conditioning and cooling efficiency is measured using a Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio. A higher SEER rating means higher energy efficiency, our Ac Repair Phoenix is one of the best service provider.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Air conditioning technologies continues, with much recent emphasis placed on energy efficiency, and on improving indoor air quality. Reducing climate change impact is an important area of innovation, because in addition to greenhouse gas emissions associated with energy use. Our Indoor Air Quality business is one of them.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Our Air Conditioning Katy business provide air-conditioning repair and a quiet solution for cooling and heating problems.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Whether you are needing AC Repair ,Humble business, looking to improve the comfort of your home or are in the market for a new air conditioning system, Kacexpress can help and providing best services.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Heating and Air Conditioning are the basic means of climate control for homes and building. Our Heating Portland business is one the best service provider in the field of Heating and Air Conditioning.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Acumen Air Conditioning Baltimore services, it benefits are Lower energy bills as well as save money every month! and Extended equipment life as well as Priority service.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Our company is licensed, bonded and fully insured. Our aim is to supply affordable service while delivering quality, and to build lasting relationships. AC Repair The Woodlands is one of the best service provider in the fielf of AC repair.

    ReplyDelete
  18. It's a great information about the mid term effect on R&D funding. it appears very useful in the field of science and technology.. HVAC Baltimore

    ReplyDelete
  19. Thanks for sharing such an informative blog..it will be helpful for my business..Maid Service Los Angeles we provide superior quality maid services in Los Angeles.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Superb Blog. Thorough information and quite a lot beneficial for us. keep posting, great work. Furnace Repair Wicker Park

    ReplyDelete
  21. Nice post, I would like to see the U.S. government redirect more policy to practical mechanisms to achieve social benefits. Air Conditioning Repair Richmond Heights

    ReplyDelete
  22. Great policy, U.S is the only major power where socially-beneficial tech development is hamstrung by a deep political phobia about industrial policy. Air Purification New Orleans

    ReplyDelete